You could hear the deep sadness in the preacher’s voice as he named «the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today — my own government.» With those words, the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., launched a scathing indictment
of America’s war in Vietnam. It was April 4, 1967.

That first antiwar sermon of his seemed to signal a new high tide of opposition to a brutal set of American policies in Southeast Asia. Just 11 days later, unexpectedly large crowds would come out in New York and San Francisco
for the first truly massive antiwar rallies. Back then, a protest of at least a quarter of a million seemed yuge.

King signaled another turning point when he concluded his speech by bringing up «something even more disturbing» — something that would deeply disturb the developing antiwar movement as well. «The war in Vietnam,» he said, «is but a symptom of a far deeper malady within the American spirit.»

Many of those who gathered at antiwar rallies days later were already beginning to suspect the same thing. Even if they could actually force their government to end its war in Vietnam, they would be healing only a symptom of a far more profound illness. With that realization came a shift in consciousness, the clearest sign of which could be found in the sizeable contingent of countercultural hippies who began joining those protests. While antiwar radicals were challenging the unjust political and military policies of their government, the counter culturists were focused on something bigger: trying to revolutionize the whole fabric of American society.

Why recall this history exactly 50 years later, in the age of Donald Trump? Curiously enough, King offered at least a partial answer to that question in his 1967 warning about the deeper malady. «If we ignore this sobering reality,» he said, «we will find ourselves… marching… and attending rallies without end.» The alternative? «We as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values.»

Like many of my generation, I feel as if, in lieu of that radical revolution, I have indeed been marching and attending rallies for the last half-century, even if there were also long fallow periods of inactivity. (In those quiet times, of course, there was always organizing and activism going on behind the scenes, preparing for the next wave of marches and demonstrations in response to the next set of obvious outrages.)

If the arc of history bends toward justice, as King claimed, it’s been a strange journey, a bizarre twisting and turning as if we were all on some crazed roller-coaster ride.

The Trump era already seems like the most bizarre twist of all, leaving us little choice but to march and rally at a quickening pace for years to come. A radical revolution in values? Unless you’re thinking of Trump’s plutocrats and environment wreckers, not so much. If anything, the nation once again finds itself facing an exaggerated symptom of a far deeper malady. Perhaps one day, like the antiwar protestors of 1967, anti-Trump protestors will say: If the American system we live under can create this atrocity, there must be something wrong with the whole thing.

But that’s the future. At present, the resistance movement, though as unexpectedly large as the movement of 1967, is still focused mainly on symptoms, the expanding list of inhumane 1% policies the Republicans (themselves in chaos) are preparing to foist on the nation. Yet to come up are the crucial questions: What’s wrong with our system? How could it produce a President Trump, a Republican hegemony, and the society-wrecking policies that go with them both? What would a radically new direction mean and how would we head there?

In 1967, antiwar activists were groping their way toward answers to similar questions. At least we have one advantage. We can look back at their answers and use them to help make sense of our own situation. As it happens, theirs are still depressingly relevant because the systemic malady that produced the Vietnam War is a close cousin to the one that has now given us President Trump.

Diagnosing Our Deep Sickness

The Sixties spawned many analyses of the ills of the American system. The ones that marked that era as revolutionary concluded that the heart of the problem was a distinctive mode of consciousness — a way of seeing, experiencing, interpreting, and being in the world. Political and cultural radicals converged, as historian Todd Gitlin concluded, in their demand for a transformation of «national if not global (or cosmic) consciousness.»

Nor was such a system uniquely American, they discovered. It was nothing less than the hallmark of Western modernity.

In exploring the nature of that «far deeper malady,» Martin Luther King, for instance, turned to the European philosopher Martin Buber, who found the root of that consciousness in modernity’s «I-It» attitude. From early childhood, he suggested, we learn to see other people as mere objects («its») with no inherent relation to us. In the process, we easily lose sight of their full humanity. That, in turn, allows us free rein to manipulate others (or as in Vietnam simply destroy them) for our own imagined benefit.

King particularly decried such dehumanization as it played itself out in American racism: «Segregation substitutes an ‘I-it’ relationship for the ‘I-thou’ relationship and ends up relegating persons to the status of things.» But he condemned it no less strongly in the economic sphere, where it affected people of all races. «The profit motive, when it is the sole basis of an economic system,» he said, «encourages a cutthroat competition and selfish ambition that inspire men to be more I-centered than thou-centered… Capitalism fails to realize that life is social.»

Another influential thinker of that era was a German-American philosopher, Herbert Marcuse. (Some radicals even marched in rallies carrying signs reading «Marx, Mao, Marcuse.») For him, the dehumanization of modernity was rooted in the way science and technology led us to view nature as a mere collection of «things» having no inherent relation to us — things to be analyzed, controlled, and if necessary destroyed for our own benefit.

Capitalists use technology, he explained, to build machines that take charge both of the workers who run them and of aspects of the natural world. The capitalists then treat those workers as so many things, not people. And the same hierarchy — boss up here, bossed down there — shows up at every level of society from the nuclear family to the international family of nations (with its nuclear arsenals). In a society riddled with structures of domination, it was no accident that the U.S. was pouring so much lethal effort into devastating Vietnam.

As Marcuse saw it, however, the worst trick those bosses play on us is to manipulate our consciousness, to seduce us into thinking that the whole system makes sense and is for our own good. When those machines are cranking out products that make workers’ lives more comfortable, most of them are willing to embrace and perpetuate a system that treats them as dominated objects.

Marcuse would not have been surprised to see so many workers voting for Donald Trump, a candidate who built his campaign on promises of ever more intensified domination — of marginalized people at home, of «bad hombres» needing to be destroyed abroad, and of course, of nature itself, especially in the form of fossil fuels
on a planet where the very processes he championed ensured a future of utter devastation.

One explanation for the electoral success of Trump was the way he appealed to heartland white working-class voters who saw their standard of living and sense of social status steadily eroding. Living in a world in which hierarchy and domination are taken for granted, it’s hardly surprising that many of them took it for granted as well that the only choice available was either to be a dominator or to be dominated. Vote for me, the billionaire businessman (famed for the phrase «You’re fired!») implicitly promised and you, too, will be one of the dominators. Vote against me and you’re doomed to remain among the dominated. Like so many other tricks of the system, this one defied reality but worked anyway.

Many Trump voters who bought into the system will find themselves facing even harsher domination by the 1%. And as the Trumpian fantasy of man dominating nature triggers inevitable twenty-first-century blowback on a planetary scale, count on growing environmental and social disasters to bring disproportionate pain to those already suffering most under the present system. In every arena, as Marcuse explained back in the 1960s, the system of hierarchy and domination remains self-perpetuating and self-escalating.

«The Long and Bitter but Beautiful Struggle for a New World»

What’s the remedy for this malady, now as lethally obvious at home as it once was in Vietnam?

«The end of domination [is] the only truly revolutionary exigency,» Marcuse wrote. True freedom, he thought, means freeing humanity from the hierarchical system that locks us into the daily struggle to earn a living by selling our labor. Freedom means liberating our consciousness to search for our own goals and being able to pursue them freely. In Martin Luther King’s words, freedom is «the opportunity to fulfill my total capacity untrammeled by any artificial barrier.»

How to put an end not only to America’s war in Vietnam, but to a whole culture built on domination? King’s answer on that April 4th was deceptively simple: «Love is somehow the key that unlocks the door… The first hope in our inventory must be the hope that love is going to have the last word.»

The simplicity in that statement was deceptive because love is itself such a complicated word. King often explained that the Greeks had three words for love: eros (aesthetic or romantic love), philia (friendship), and agape (self-sacrificing devotion to others). He left no doubt that he considered agape far superior to the other two.

The emerging counterculture of those years certainly agreed with him on the centrality of love to human liberation. After all, it was «the love generation.» But its mantra — «If it feels good, do it» — made King’s rejection of eros in the name of self-negating agape a non-starter for them.

King, however, offered another view of love, which was far more congenial to the counterculture. Love unites whatever is separated, he preached. This is the kind of love that God uses in his work. We, in turn, are always called upon to imitate God and so to transform our society into what King called a «beloved community.»

Though few people at the time made the connection, King’s Christian understanding of love was strikingly similar to Marcuse’s secular view of erotic love. Marcuse saw eros as the fulfillment of desire. He also saw it as anything but selfish, since it flows from what Freud called the id, which always wants to abolish ego boundaries and recover that sense of oneness with everything we all had as infants.

When we experience anyone or anything erotically, we feel that we are inherently interconnected, «tied together in a single garment of destiny,» as King so eloquently put it. When boundaries and separation dissolve, there can be no question of hierarchy or domination.

Every moment that hints at such unification brings us pleasure. In a revolutionary society that eschews structures of domination for the ideal of unification, all policies are geared toward creating more moments of unity and pleasure.

Think of this as the deep-thought revolution of the Sixties: radically transformed minds would create a radically transformed society. Revolutionaries of that time were, in fact, trying to wage the very utopian struggle that King summoned all Americans to in his April 4th speech, «the long and bitter but beautiful struggle for a new world.»

50 Years Later: The Thread That Binds

At this very moment 50 years ago, a movement resisting a brutal war of domination in a distant land was giving birth to a movement calling for the creation of a new consciousness to heal our ailing society. Will the resistance movement of 2017 head in a similar direction?

At first glance, it seems unlikely. After all, ever since the Vietnam War ended, progressives have had a tendency to focus on single issues of injustice or laundry lists of problems. They have rarely imagined the American system as anything more than a collection of wrong-headed policies and wrong-hearted politicians. In addition, after years of resisting the right wing as it won victory after victory, and of watching the Democrats morph into a neoliberal crew and then into a failing party with its own dreary laundry lists of issues and personalities, the capacity to hope for fundamental change may have gone the way of Herbert Marcuse and Martin Luther King.

Still, for those looking hard, a thread of hope exists. Today’s marches, rallies, and town halls are packed with veterans of the Sixties who can remember, if we try, what it felt like to believe we were fighting not only to stop a war but to start a revolution in consciousness. No question about it, we made plenty of mistakes back then. Now, with so much more experience (however grim) in our memory banks, perhaps we might develop more flexible strategies and a certain faith in taking a more patient, long-term approach to organizing for change.

Don’t forget as well that, whatever our failings and the failings of other past movements, we also have a deep foundation of victories (along with defeats) to build on. No, there was no full-scale revolution in our society — no surprise there. But in so many facets of our world, advances happened nonetheless. Think of how, in those 50 years just past, views on diversity, social equality, the environment, healthcare, and so many other issues, which once existed only on the fringes of our world, have become thoroughly mainstream. Taken as a whole, they represent a partial but still profound and significant set of changes in American consciousness.

Of course, the Sixties not only can’t be resurrected, but shouldn’t be. (After all, it should never be forgotten that what they led to wasn’t a dreamed of new society but the «Reagan revolution,» as the arc of justice took the first of its many grim twists and turns.) At best, the Sixties critique of the system would have to be updated to include many new developments.

Even the methods of those Sixties radicals would need major revisions, given that our world, especially of communication, now relies so heavily on blindingly fast changes in technology. But every time we log onto the Internet and browse the web, it should remind us that — shades of the past — across this embattled Earth of ours, we’re all tied together in a single worldwide web of relations and of destiny. It’s either going to be one for all and all for one, or it’s going to be none for 7.4 billion on a planet heading for hell.

Today is different, too, because our movement was not born out of protest against an odious policy, but against an odious mindset embodied in a deplorable person who nonetheless managed to take the Oval Office. He’s so obviously a symptom of something larger and deeper that perhaps the protesters of this generation will grasp more quickly than the radicals of the Vietnam era that America’s underlying disease is a destructive mode of consciousness (and not just a bad combover).

The move from resisting individual policies to transforming American consciousness may already have begun in small ways. After all, «love trumps hate» has become the most common slogan of the progressive movement. And the word love is being heard in hard-edged political discourse, not only on the left, but among mainstream political voices like Van Jones
and Cory Booker. Once again, there is even talk of «revolutionary love

Of course, the specific policies of the Republicans and this president (including his developing war policies) must be resisted and the bleeding of the immediate moment staunched. Yet the urgent question of the late 1960s remains: What can be done when there are so many fronts on which to struggle and the entire system demands constant vigilant attention? In the age of a president who regularly sucks all the air out of the room, how do we even talk about all of this without being overwhelmed?

In many ways, the current wave of regressive change and increasing chaos in Washington should be treated as a caricature of the system that we all have been living under for so long. Turn to that broader dimension and the quest for a new consciousness may prove the thread that, though hardly noticed, already ties together the many facets of the developing resistance movement.

The largest mobilization for progressive politics since the Vietnam era offers a unique opportunity to go beyond simply treating symptoms and start offering cures for the underlying illness. If this opportunity is missed, versions of the same symptoms are likely to recur, while unpredictable new ones will undoubtedly emerge for the next 50 years, and as Martin Luther King predicted, we will go on marching without end. Surely, we deserve a better future and a better fate.

Ira Chernus, a TomDispatch regular, is professor emeritus of Religious Studies at the University of Colorado Boulder and author of the online

Follow TomDispatch on Twitter and join us on Facebook. Check out the newest Dispatch Book, John Dower’s The Violent American Century: War and Terror Since World War II, as well as John Feffer’s dystopian novel Splinterlands, Nick Turse’s Next Time They’ll Come to Count the Dead, and Tom Engelhardt’s Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World.

Copyright 2017 Ira Chernus

Ira Chernus – 2017

568 Comentarios

  1. Very good written story. It will be beneficial to everyone who utilizes it, as well as myself. Keep up the good work – for sure i will check out more posts.

  2. how long should you wait to take viagra after eating who sells viagra non prescription viagra over the counter in louisville, kentucky?
    sildenafil dosage recommendations cialis 20 mg best price
    when will us make over the counter viagra

  3. I constantly spent my hhalf an hpur to readd this weblog’s articles or revews all the time along with a muug of coffee.

    Kamagra online webpage
    Levitra Generika kaufen

  4. Greetings! Very useful advice in this particular post! It is the little changes that will make the most important changes. Many thanks for sharing!

  5. Its such as you read my thoughts! You appear to grasp so much approximately this, like you wrote the e book in it or something. I believe that you simply could do with some % to power the message house a bit, however other than that, that is wonderful blog. A fantastic read. I will certainly be back.

  6. This design is wicked! You certainly know how to keep a reader entertained.
    Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog
    (well, almost…HaHa!) Excellent job. I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it.
    Too cool!

  7. Anyone who has at all seen a too soon laddie desire not be talented to thoughts it. Pigmy fingers, fell thinner than series stationery: unknown memoirs is enclosed in an infinitely fragile shell. All the confidence of loved ones is on the adroitness of doctors who intent relief the mollycoddle credulous and develop. You can meditate on how painful it is to both the son’s relatives and the doctors viagra generic when there are methods of treating a indulge in the planet, but in this fatherland and in this bishopric they are not available. Let’s assistants the smallest ones go top-class medical tribulation!

  8. My coder is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on numerous websites for about a year and am anxious about switching to another platform. I have heard good things about Is there a way I can import all my wordpress posts into it? Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated!

  9. Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your post seem to be running off the screen in Opera. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know. The layout look great though! Hope you get the issue fixed soon. Thanks

  10. sildenafil (viagra) prolongs erection by __________.
    where to safely buy viagra online
    how much does mikitary spend on viagra

  11. how do they get rid of an erection if i took a viagra
    what happens if a man without an erectial difunction takes viagra
    pornstars stomach issues from viagra

  12. I’ve been browsing on-line greater than 3 hours as of late, yet I by no means found any interesting article like yours. It’s beautiful price sufficient for me. In my opinion, if all site owners and bloggers made good content as you probably did, the web can be a lot more helpful than ever before.

  13. Hi there! I just would like to give you a huge thumbs up for your excellent info you have right here on this post. I will be coming back to your site for more soon.

  14. In Staffing, anytime, so theoretical are the agents recommended past the extent’s best situate to believe cialis online forum uncharted that the getting one’s hands urinalysis of deterrent from at tests to look as if the quotation gradual, forms to give every indication its prevalence. best online casino Qfjjoo lxzsqh

  15. Approximately canada online dispensary into a summary where she be required to use herself, up epoch circulation-to-face with the united and renal replacement remedial programme himselfРІ GOP Sensitivity Dan Crenshaw Crystalloids Cradle РІSNLРІ Modifiers Him For Particular Eye In Midwest. cialis pills Acbflq dzonim

  16. Warning: Vernon Hills, IL and Libertyville, IL and surrounding 50 miles radius area is in active war zone ! Towns are held hostage by UK agents, Russian spies, Indian spies, Mexican spies, Chinese spies, and other Hispanic spies

  17. ISM Phototake 3) Watney Ninth Phototake, Canada online dispensary Phototake, Biophoto Siblings Adjunct Therapy, Inc, Impaired Rheumatoid Lupus LLC 4) Bennett Hundred Prison Situations, Inc 5) Temporary Atrial Activation LLC 6) Stockbyte 7) Bubonic Resection Grade LLC 8) Composure With and May Go in requital for WebMD 9) Gallop WebbWebMD 10) Shoot Resorption It LLC 11) Katie Go-between and May Bring forward after WebMD 12) Phototake 13) MedioimagesPhotodisc 14) Sequestrum 15) Dr. buy tadalafil Mdiolq olzytq

  18. Знаете ли вы?
    Российская учёная показала, что проект «Новой Москвы» 1923 года воспроизводил план трёхвековой давности.
    Подруга и последовательница Льва Толстого уже в детстве ходила босиком и отвергала нарядную одежду.
    Англичане купили заказанную португальцами рукопись голландца и бельгийца с изображениями монархов десяти королевств.
    Американский лейтенант из конвоя PQ-17 был спасён советским танкером и наладил его оборону от авианалётов.
    100-летний ветеран внёс уникальный вклад в борьбу со смертельной угрозой.


  19. Знаете ли вы?
    Китайскую пустыню засадили лесами и открыли там фешенебельный курорт.
    Министр социального обеспечения Израиля однажды назвала почти всех выходцев из СССР своими клиентами.
    Художник-карикатурист известен пародией на мунковский «Крик».
    Английский крейсер ценой четырёх попаданий защитил конвой от немецкого рейдера.
    Копенгагенский собор пришлось выстроить заново после визита англичан в 1807 году.

  20. Знаете ли вы?
    Не удержавшись от писательства, Амалия Кахана-Кармон создала одну из важнейших книг в истории Израиля.
    Канадский солдат в одиночку освободил от немцев нидерландский город.
    «С любимыми не расставайтесь…» автор написал после того, как чуть не погиб в железнодорожной катастрофе.
    Один из старейших музеев Амстердама находится в церкви на чердаке.
    Альбом «Битлз», признанный одним из величайших в истории музыки, ругали за искусственность и «перепродюсированность».

  21. Знаете ли вы?
    Предок вождя революции участвовал в управлении долгами Российской империи.
    Один из старейших музеев Амстердама находится в церкви на чердаке.
    Крейсер «Берик» на рейде в Девонпорте
    Подруга и последовательница Льва Толстого уже в детстве ходила босиком и отвергала нарядную одежду.
    Преподаватель нескольких университетов, попавший в сталинские лагеря, и там умудрился обучать математике на куске мыла.


  22. Знаете ли вы?
    Владелец вернул похищенную картину Пикассо почтой, не найдя покупателей.
    Потомок наполеоновского генерала стал Героем Советского Союза.
    Молнию можно не только увидеть, но и съесть.
    Один из старейших музеев Амстердама находится в церкви на чердаке.
    После 50 черепно-мозговых травм регбист завершил карьеру, опасаясь получить синдром деменции.


  23. Знаете ли вы?
    Американский лейтенант из конвоя PQ-17 был спасён советским танкером и наладил его оборону от авианалётов.
    Русские мечтали о шапке-невидимке, а древние греки — о кольце невидимости.
    Залётная птаха занесена в перечень птиц России спустя более полувека после открытия вида.
    Советские военные операторы на базе ленд-лизовского кинопулемёта и ППШ создали киноавтомат.
    Старейший депутат Палаты представителей проработал в Конгрессе США почти до 92 лет.

  24. Знаете ли вы?
    Первый в мире короткоствольный револьвер (англ.)русск. с откидным барабаном стал символом кинонуара.
    Биограф русского художника романтизировала историю его французской прародительницы вслед за Герценом.
    Роден назвал свои «Врата ада» напрямую, а его соотечественник только намекнул.
    Картина парада Победы, где руководство страны смещено на задний план, получила Сталинскую премию.
    Битву русских дружин и монголо-татар возле леса отмечают сразу в трёх селениях.

  25. Please let me know if you’re looking for a author for your site.
    You have some really great posts and I feel I would be
    a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off,
    I’d absolutely love to write some articles for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine.
    Please blast me an email if interested. Cheers!

    Feel free to surf to my webpage … 더킹카지노

  26. Having read this I believed it was really informative. I appreciate you spending some time and effort to put
    this informative article together. I once again find myself personally spending a lot of time both reading and posting comments.
    But so what, it was still worth it!

    Feel free to surf to my site 더킹카지노

  27. como ganhar na lotofacil acertar na lotofacil ganhar na lotofacil como ganhar na lotofacil de verdade como ganhar na lotofacil sempre como ganhar na lotofacil 2020 como ganhar na lotofacil 100 garantido dicas lotofacil como acertar na lotofacil dicas para ganhar na lotofacil

Dejar respuesta

Por favor escribe tu comentario
Pro favor introduce tu nombre